Unfortunately,
I was not able to attend the lectures this week. As I read the blog
posts, I understand that I missed a good chance to get deeper
understanding of the context. After only have been reading in order to
get knowledge, I believe it would have been refreshing to stimulate
other senses. To compensate for this, I was in contact with a course
mate who informed me about the main topics that were brought to light
and discussed at the seminar. Also, I was presented to the background of
the book and its authors. What struck me above everything, was the
situation in which the authors were, while this book was written. In a
time frame of the second World War, characterized by propaganda and
deception, these two Jewish authors were forced to migrate. With this in
mind, it is not hard to understand the authors’ somewhat negative
perspective on the mass media and culture industry.
It has been interesting to study the theme of this week. I enjoyed reading some parts of Dialectic of Enlightenment as
it brought me to a lot of thinking of how the context is applicable on
today’s society. The ubiquitous 'new media' in today’s society is
obviously not the same as 'new media' was when the book was written in
1944. Above all, one important characteristic of media today is the
interactivity, for example compared to the television in 1944. For that
reason, the reasoning on 'new media' carried out by the authors, is not
entirely applicable on the media of today.
The 'new' media forms of today (Internet, web and social media) have make
room for interaction among the audience and expanded the limit of free
thoughts. But concerning the issue of mass deception and mass culture,
it is hard to say if these new media platforms have served to prevent
these phenomenons since 1944 or not. As the authors claim back in 1944, I
suspect humans contributes to the mass culture whether we want it or
not. Now as then, there are probably 'forces' that we cannot control
over, that map our media habits and put humans in different categories.
For example, big companies uses economic strategies to translate
information about individuals, in order to make use of these data in the
business and earn money. In turn, they can determinate what culture
should be. On the other hand, there are probably forces against the mass
deception as well, which have received more space due to the 'new'
media forms. Even though we can see tendencies of today's media society
that is bearing a resemblance with former mass media, I believe there is
one big difference; everyone can be heard on Internet, which is not the
case through television.
To
conclude, I really see the relevance of reading and discussing the
raised questions of this theme. As a media technology engineer it is
important to understand the media society as a whole and see what role
media is playing. In big, the theme 'critical media theory' is about thinking critically and
always question the media when it is developing
into newer forms.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar